ThoughtFiles
Feb. 27th, 2011 06:25 pm* Our culture resents and mocks hipsters for the same reason that I love them: they are the only large, culturally influential group that openly discriminates against the mainstream. Pop culture and its followers aren't used to being othered, and they really don't like the feeling. File under 'Taste Of One's Own Medicine'.
* When I was a teenager, I didn't have a sexuality of my own. I was attracted to people, but I didn't know why or what the factors of that attraction were. I was horny, but I didn't fantasize about normal things when masturbating - which I did infrequently. When I decided to learn about sex the way I learned about everything else, that there had to be books on the subject, I found that the only people speaking up were the BDSM and paraphilia communities. I owe my knowledge of sexuality and the emotional relating that underlies sexual relationships to books on S&M, clinical studies profiling D/S relationships, and slash fiction. File under 'Things I Owe To Kinksters'.
* Love is the reason we create things not because Love is itself creative, but because Love is a destroyer. It's so fun and addictive that we mostly don't mind the necessity, but love will destroy our conceptions of self, beauty, boundaries, value, meaning, risk - it can basically rewrite our context for everything and take apart any relationship, grabbing it by the metaphors and shaking. That's where the stereotypes come from of the loveless coward, the reckless heartthrob, all the rational people seduced by their emotions: all are reflections of this one truth. Dangerous Love breaks things and we are forced to pick up and rearrange the pieces in the aftermath. File under 'Structural Assay of MetaRelationships'.
* When I was a teenager, I didn't have a sexuality of my own. I was attracted to people, but I didn't know why or what the factors of that attraction were. I was horny, but I didn't fantasize about normal things when masturbating - which I did infrequently. When I decided to learn about sex the way I learned about everything else, that there had to be books on the subject, I found that the only people speaking up were the BDSM and paraphilia communities. I owe my knowledge of sexuality and the emotional relating that underlies sexual relationships to books on S&M, clinical studies profiling D/S relationships, and slash fiction. File under 'Things I Owe To Kinksters'.
* Love is the reason we create things not because Love is itself creative, but because Love is a destroyer. It's so fun and addictive that we mostly don't mind the necessity, but love will destroy our conceptions of self, beauty, boundaries, value, meaning, risk - it can basically rewrite our context for everything and take apart any relationship, grabbing it by the metaphors and shaking. That's where the stereotypes come from of the loveless coward, the reckless heartthrob, all the rational people seduced by their emotions: all are reflections of this one truth. Dangerous Love breaks things and we are forced to pick up and rearrange the pieces in the aftermath. File under 'Structural Assay of MetaRelationships'.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-28 01:27 am (UTC)(Fyi, when I finally run away to Texas to seduce you, I'm considering wearing a lowcut shirt with some sort of small furry animal peering out of the neckline. Winning strategy?)
no subject
Date: 2011-02-28 02:16 am (UTC)I'm starting in on the backlog of my flist now. Sorry for the long posting hiatus. /o\
no subject
Date: 2011-02-28 02:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-01 06:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-01 12:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-01 06:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-28 09:54 am (UTC)I like what you say about people who speak up about sexuality. Before I started finding my own footing as a sexual explorer (which feels like only happened about five minutes ago), I owed my early horizon expansions to members of LGBT (and especially the LGBT activist) communities. One of those was poly, and another was kink. They taught me how to look at things that didn't feel wrong and develop a perspective where they weren't.
I drafted some thoughts on the love bit but fatigue dissembled the sense-making and I decided to frog a bed. Instead.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-28 10:49 pm (UTC)Ooo, I feel like there's a deeper thought in here [my first rambly paragraph] about how critical many White listeners got about sampling in the first decades of hip-hop prominence ("That's not music," "They're just stealing someone else's work," etc.) because when White music was sampled, it was objectified, it was recontextualized, and it carried the implication (to those who can only think in hierarchies) that the mixer somehow believed the original ("normal"/mainstream) was less than superlative, or even perfect.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-01 12:51 am (UTC)If you want to go further back, the use of variations by classical composers goes back to the 16th century.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-01 07:24 am (UTC)For gods sake, THE ARCADE FIRE won a GRAMMY.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-28 10:15 pm (UTC)I would personally posit that that particular niche market is nothing more than the latest permutation of subculture where the "locus of identity" is external rather than internal (the focus on fashion, music, and other external accoutrements, as well as the use of pop culture iconography (albeit couched in so-called irony) is no different than say goth, skater, or nerd culture). As far as placing the populace at large (I have no other description of the "pop culture body politic" other than that) in the category of "other", that’s a time honored tradition of disaffected youth.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-01 07:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-01 08:30 pm (UTC)As it exists now, if you start indexing by novelty or used some sort of symbolic Huffman coding (for example) the things that define "hipsterdom", there's an incredibly narrow focus.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-01 10:47 pm (UTC)