flamingsword: “in my defense, I was left unsupervised” (Default)
flamingsword ([personal profile] flamingsword) wrote2010-04-16 07:01 pm
Entry tags:

sexual orientation grid

There's a discussion I'd like to be part of, and to provide meaningful input to others they will want to see this:



I've never considered my sexuality in terms of a "goal" before, and it's a little uncomfortable to think of it in those terms now. I'm with the partners that fit my sexual and emotional needs while fitting into my life. That (to me) has nothing to do with their gender. Boys tend toward direct, and that's a lot easier for me. I must admit that most women continue to baffle me with their subtlety and reliance on emotional tools that I can not use, but that's largely cultural. Black women, nerd women, and riot grrls do not apply those standards to themselves, and I get on much better with them romantically.

Also I am, by inclination, attracted to men ~2x as often as to women. The fact that women are underrepresented in my dating portfolio to this degree has more to do with the fact that the kind of women I like are generally above my pay grade.

[identity profile] flamingsword.livejournal.com 2010-04-17 07:29 pm (UTC)(link)
What you guys have would make me feel needy and clingy, and I would hate that. There's some sort of minimum weekly expectation I have for time spent together, and it may not be much but it is very definite. Anybody I don't see at least every week I either pine for and feel deprived or the physical part of the attraction dies away.

I think I am very smell-dependent and tactile with my lovers. I don't think that's fixable.

[identity profile] jslorentz.livejournal.com 2010-04-18 04:12 am (UTC)(link)
I find that interesting, since you recently said you have no trouble being sexual with your friends without it drastically changing the friendship. Am I misquoting you, or could you elaborate on the "physical part" dying away?